Clinical Psychology: Research and Practice Innovations

Clinical Psychology: Research and Practice Innovations"

Prediction of Problematic Smartphone use Based on Temperament Dimensions in Adolescents with the Mediation of Interpersonal Sensitivity

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Shabnam Vatanpoor 1
Mitra Khaghani Fard 2
Mehrnaz Azadyekta 3
1 Master of Science in Personality Psychology, Department of Psychology, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Social Work Education, Psychology and Social Health Unit, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
10.22075/jcp.2024.33997.2886
Abstract
Abstract

Introduction: The present study aimed at predicting the problematic smartphone use in young adolescents based on the dimensions of temperament and character with the intervening variable of interpersonal sensitivity.
Method: To this end, 385 young adolescents (207 females and 178 male) were selected using available sampling in Tehran and were asked to answer the abridged Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI-56), Boyce and Parker Interpersonal Sensitivity Questionnaire and Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS).
Results: Two hypothetical models were tested in the study: in the first model, the interpersonal sensitivity mediated the effects of temperament factors on problematic smartphone use; and the second model was based on character factors. Recruiting fitness indices, evaluation of the hypothetical models revealed that both models, if modified, would gain momentum fit. In the model of temperament factors, innovation and persistence had a direct effect, and harm avoidance and dependence reward had an indirect effect on problematic smartphone use, respectively. In the character model, cooperation had a direct effect and self-directedness had both direct and indirect effects on problematic smartphone use.
Conclusion: Overall, the results revealed that the personality factors of temperament and character could predict the problematic smartphone use in young adolescents through the mediation of interpersonal sensitivity. Supporting the hypothetical research models for problematic smartphone use, findings of the study provide a suitable framework for the pathology of this common phenomenon in young adolescents.

Keywords
Problematic Smartphone Use
Dimensions of Temperament and Character
Interpersonal Sensitivity
Path Analysis
Young Adolescents
Subjects

  1. منابع

    1. Olson JA, Sandra DA, Colucci ÉS, Al Bikaii A, Chmoulevitch D, Nahas J, Raz A, Veissière SP. Smartphone addiction is increasing across the world: A meta-analysis of 24 countries. Computers in Human Behavior. 2022 Apr 1; 129:107138.
    2. Ghasemi V, Rabiei K, Davoodi S, Rabiei H. Mobile internet usage among adolescents and young adults in Iran: A Sociological survey. Journal of History Culture and Art Research. 2017 Feb 28;6(1):863-78.
    3. Baert S, Vujić S, Amez S, Claeskens M, Daman T, Maeckelberghe A, Omey E, De Marez L. Smartphone use and academic performance: correlation or causal relationship? Kyklos. 2020 Feb;73(1):22-46.
    4. Elhai JD, Dvorak RD, Levine JC, Hall BJ. Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology. Journal of affective disorders. 2017 Jan 1; 207:251-9.
    5. Fischer-Grote L, Kothgassner OD, Felnhofer A. Risk factors for problematic smartphone use in children and adolescents: a review of existing literature. neuropsychiatrie. 2019;33(4):179.
    6. Kwon M, Kim DJ, Cho H, Yang S. The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PloS one. 2013 Dec 31;8(12): e83558.
    7. Demirci K, Akgönül M, Akpinar A. Relationship of smartphone use severity with sleep quality, depression, and anxiety in university students. Journal of behavioral addictions. 2015 Jun;4(2):85-92.
    8. Kwok SW, Lee PH, Lee RL. Smart device use and perceived physical and psychosocial outcomes among Hong Kong adolescents. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2017 Feb;14(2):205.
    9. Rozgonjuk D, Levine JC, Hall BJ, Elhai JD. The association between problematic smartphone use, depression and anxiety symptom severity, and objectively measured smartphone use over one week. Computers in Human Behavior. 2018 Oct 1; 87:10-7.
    10. Susman EJ, Dorn LD. Its Role in Development. Handbook of adolescent psychology, volume 1: Individual bases of adolescent development. 2009 Apr 6; 1:116.
    11. Berk LE. Development through the lifespan. Sage Publications; 2022 Jul 26.
    12. Medrano JL, Lopez Rosales F, Gámez-Guadix M. Assessing the links of sexting, cybervictimization, depression, and suicidal ideation among university students. Archives of suicide research. 2018 Jan 2;22(1):153-64.
    13. Qorshi Zohreh, Loripour Marzieh, Lotfipourrafsanjani Seyedeh Maryam. The rate of access to mobile phones and the prevalence of their use for exchanging sexual concepts among high school students in Rafsanjan, 2015. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (Thought and Behavior) [Internet]. 2018;24(4):416-425 Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/16989/fa
    14. Nagygyörgy K, Pápay O, Urbán R, Farkas J, Kun B, Griffiths M, Demetrovics Z. Problematic online gaming. A review of the literature. Psychiatria Hungarica: A Magyar Pszichiátriai Társaság Tudományos Folyóirata. 2013 Jan 1;28(2):122-44.
    15. Charlton JP, Danforth ID. Validating the distinction between computer addiction and engagement: Online game playing and personality. Behaviour & Information Technology. 2010 Nov 1;29(6):601-13.
    16. Peters CS, Malesky Jr LA. Problematic usage among highly-engaged players of massively multiplayer online role playing games. Cyber psychology & behavior. 2008 Aug 1;11(4):481-4.
    17. Mehroof M, Griffiths MD. Online gaming addiction: The role of sensation seeking, self-control, neuroticism, aggression, state anxiety, and trait anxiety. Cyber psychology, behavior, and social networking. 2010 Jun 1;13(3):313-6.
    18. Lemmens JS, Valkenburg PM, Peter J. Psychosocial causes and consequences of pathological gaming. Computers in human behavior. 2011 Jan 1;27(1):144-52.
    19. Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD. Internet and gaming addiction: a systematic literature review of neuroimaging studies. Brain sciences. 2012 Sep 5;2(3):347-74.
    20. Cloninger CR. A unified biosocial theory of personality and its role in the development of anxiety states. Psychiatric developments. 1986 Jan 1;3(2):167-226.
    21. Cloninger CR. A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants: A proposal. Archives of general psychiatry. 1987 Jun 1;44(6):573-88.
    22. Cloninger CR, Svrakic DM, Przybeck TR. A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of general psychiatry. 1993 Dec 1;50(12):975-90.
    23. Cloninger CR, editor. Personality and psychopathology. American Psychiatric Pub; 1999.
    24. Fırat S, Gül H, Sertçelik M, Gül A, Gürel Y, Kılıç BG. The relationship between problematic smartphone use and psychiatric symptoms among adolescents who applied to psychiatry clinics. Psychiatry Research. 2018 Dec 1; 270:97-103.
    25. Sun X, Zhang Y, Niu G, Tian Y, Xu L, Duan C. Ostracism and problematic smartphone use: the mediating effect of social self-efficacy and moderating effect of rejection sensitivity. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 2021 Sep 30:1-4.
    26. Li C, Liu D, Dong Y. Self-esteem and problematic smartphone use among adolescents: A moderated mediation model of depression and interpersonal trust. Frontiers in psychology. 2019 Dec 20; 10:2872.
    27. Farahi SM, Kashani SR, Gallitto E, Leth-Steensen C. Aspects of interpersonal sensitivity relate differentially to subclinical social phobia and autistic traits. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2022 Apr 29;10(1).
    28. Boyce P, Parker G. Development of a scale to measure interpersonal sensitivity. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 1989 Jan 1;23(3):341-51.
    29. Harb GC, Heimberg RG, Fresco DM, Schneier FR, Liebowitz MR. The psychometric properties of the Interpersonal Sensitivity Measure in social anxiety disorder. Behaviour research and therapy. 2002 Aug 1;40(8):961-79.
    30. Smith TW, Glazer K, Ruiz JM, Gallo LC. Hostility, anger, aggressiveness, and coronary heart disease: An interpersonal perspective on personality, emotion, and health. Journal of personality. 2004 Dec;72(6):1217-70.
    31. Wilhelm K, Boyce P, Brownhill S. The relationship between interpersonal sensitivity, anxiety disorders and major depression. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2004 Apr 1;79(1-3):33-41.
    32. Grimm LG, Yarnold PR. Reading and understanding multivariate statistics. American psychological association; 1995.
    33. Adan A, Serra-Grabulosa JM, Caci H, Natale V. A reduced Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI-56). Psychometric properties in a non-clinical sample. Personality and Individual Differences. 2009 May 1;46(7):687-92
    34. Ranjbar Nousheri, Farzaneh, Abolghasemi, Baradaran, Asadi Mejreh, Samara, Molaei, Mehri. Validation and validation of the short version of the Personality Inventory (TCI-56) in students. Knowledge and Research in Applied Psychology. 2022 Feb 20;22(4):58-75.‎
    35. Boyce P, Parker G. Development of a scale to measure interpersonal sensitivity. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 1989 Jan 1;23(3):341-51.

        36.Bayrami, Mansour, Hashemi, Ashouri. The effectiveness of emotion regulation training on social adjustment and interpersonal sensitivity of high school students. Social Psychology Research. 2017 Oct 23;7(27):1-4.‎Kwon M, Kim DJ, Cho H, Yang S. The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PloS one. 2013 Dec 31;8(12):e83558

    1. Hajhosseini, Shadi, Fati, Laden, Fathi-Ashtiani. Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Persian version of the Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS). Psychology. 2022 Mar 25;101(26):24-34.‎
    2. Maughan B, McCarthy G. Childhood adversities and psychosocial disorders. British medical bulletin. 1997 Jan 1;53(1):156-69.
    3. Hanafi E, Siste K, Wiguna T, Kusumadewi I, Nasrun MW. Temperament profile and its association with the vulnerability to smartphone addiction of medical students in Indonesia. PLoS One. 2019 Jul 11;14(7): e0212244.
    4. Olivencia-Carrión MA, Ferri-García R, del Mar Rueda M, Jiménez-Torres MG, López-Torrecillas F. Temperament and characteristics related to nomophobia. Psychiatry Research. 2018 Aug 1; 266:5-10.
    5. Rahme C, Hallit R, Akel M, Chalhoub C, Hachem M, Hallit S, Obeid S. Nomophobia and temperaments in Lebanon: results of a national study. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care. 2022 Oct;58(4):1607-12.
    6. Choi DH, Jung YS. Temperament, Character and Cognitive Emotional Regulation in the Latent Profile Classification of Smartphone Addiction in University Students. Sustainability. 2022 Sep 16;14(18):11643.
    7. Aljomaa SS, Qudah MF, Albursan IS, Bakhiet SF, Abduljabbar AS. Smartphone addiction among university students in the light of some variables. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016 Aug 1; 61:155-64.
    8. Samaha M, Hawi NS. Relationships among smartphone addiction, stress, academic performance, and satisfaction with life. Computers in human behavior. 2016 Apr 1; 57:321-5.
    9. Lee SJ, Choi MJ, Yu SH, Kim H, Park SJ, Choi IY. Development and evaluation of smartphone usage management system for preventing problematic smartphone use. Digital health. 2022 Mar; 8:20552076221089095.
    10. Cloninger CR. A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants: A proposal. Archives of general psychiatry. 1987 Jun 1;44(6):573-88.
    11. Chae H, Park SH, Garcia D, Lee SJ. Cloninger’s TCI associations with adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies. PeerJ. 2019 Oct 24;7: e7958.
    12. Chiu SI. The relationship between life stress and smartphone addiction on Taiwanese university student: A mediation model of learning self-efficacy and social self-efficacy. Computers in human behavior. 2014 May 1; 34:49-57.
    13. Xu TT, Wang HZ, Fonseca W, Zimmerman MA, Rost DH, Gaskin J, Wang JL. The relationship between academic stress and adolescents’ problematic smartphone usage. Addiction Research & Theory. 2019 Mar 4;27(2):162-9.
    14. Lin L, Wang X, Li Q, Xia B, Chen P, Wang W. The influence of interpersonal sensitivity on smartphone addiction: a moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021 Jul 22; 12:670223.
    15. Brand M, Young KS, Laier C, Wölfling K, Potenza MN. Integrating psychological and neurobiological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific Internet-use disorders: An Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2016 Dec 1; 71:252-66.
    16. Oberst U, Wegmann E, Stodt B, Brand M, Chamarro A. Negative consequences from heavy social networking in adolescents: The mediating role of fear of missing out. Journal of adolescence. 2017 Feb 1; 55:51-60.
    17. Przybylski AK, Murayama K, DeHaan CR, Gladwell V. Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in human behavior. 2013 Jul 1;29(4):1841-8.
    18. Lin L, Wang X, Li Q, Xia B, Chen P, Wang W. The influence of interpersonal sensitivity on smartphone addiction: a moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021 Jul 22; 12:670223.
    19. Hussain Z, Griffiths MD, Baguley T. Online gaming addiction: Classification, prediction and associated risk factors. Addiction Research & Theory. 2012 Oct 1;20(5):359-71.
    20. Hussain Z, Williams GA, Griffiths MD. An exploratory study of the association between online gaming addiction and enjoyment motivations for playing massively multiplayer online role-playing games. Computers in Human Behavior. 2015 Sep 1; 50:221-30.
    21. Cloninger CR. Biology of personality dimensions. Current Opinion in Psychiatry. 2000 Nov 1;13(6):611-6.
    22. Hahn E, Reuter M, Spinath FM, Montag C. Internet addiction and its facets: The role of genetics and the relation to self-directedness. Addictive behaviors. 2017 Feb 1; 65:137-46.
    23. Nejadhamdy N. The Prediction of Internet Addiction in Female Students Based on Cloninger’s Temperament and Character. Journal of Modern Psychology. 2021 Jun 1;1(1):65-78.
    24. You Z, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Xu Y, Chen X. How does self-esteem affect mobile phone addiction? The mediating role of social anxiety and interpersonal sensitivity. Psychiatry research. 2019 Jan 1; 271:526-31.
    25. Lin L, Wang X, Li Q, Xia B, Chen P, Wang W. The influence of interpersonal sensitivity on smartphone addiction: a moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021 Jul 22; 12:670223.
    26. Choi DH, Jung YS. Temperament, Character and Cognitive Emotional Regulation in the Latent Profile Classification of Smartphone Addiction in University Students. Sustainability. 2022 Sep 16;14(18):11643.
    27. Dalbudak E, Evren C, Aldemir S, Coskun KS, Ugurlu H, Yildirim FG. Relationship of internet addiction severity with depression, anxiety, and alexithymia, temperament and character in university students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2013 Apr 1;16(4):272-8.
    28. Lu X, Katoh T, Chen Z, Nagata T, Kitamura T. Text messaging: Are dependency and excessive use discretely different for Japanese university students? Psychiatry Research. 2014 May 15;216(2):255-62.
    29. Gutiérrez F, Gárriz M, Peri JM, Vall G, Torrubia R. How temperament and character affect our career, relationships, and mental health. Comprehensive Psychiatry. 2016 Oct 1; 70:181-9.

  • Receive Date 06 May 2024
  • Revise Date 26 August 2024
  • Accept Date 27 August 2024
  • First Publish Date 27 August 2024
  • Publish Date 21 June 2024