ویژگی های روان سنجی نسخه فارسی مقیاس سوگ آسیب زا- خود گزارش دهی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم‌انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.

2 استاد، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم‌انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.

3 دانشیار، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم‌انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

زمینه: این مطالعه با هدف بررسی ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی نسخه فارسی پرسشنامه سوگ آسیب‌زا در یک نمونه در دسترس از افراد سوگوار ایرانی انجام شد.
روش: پژوهش پیمایشی (زمینه ای) حاضر، شامل ۱۳۸ فرد سوگوار (۱۲۷ زن و ۱۱ مرد، میانگین سنی ۴۴ سال) بود که بیش از یک سال از فوت عزیزشان گذشته بود و با روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند. داده‌ها با استفاده از نسخه فارسی پرسشنامه سوگ آسیب‌زا، پرسشنامه کوتاه نشانه‌های بیماری و پرسشنامه شادکامی آکسفورد، گردآوری و با تحلیل عاملی تأییدی، ضرایب همبستگی و شاخص‌های پایایی تحلیل شدند.
یافته‌ها: تحلیل عاملی تأییدی پس از اصلاحات نشان‌دهنده برازش قابل­قبول مدل بود؛ تمام گویه‌ها بجز گویه 15 بار عاملی بالای 0/04داشتند. مقدار شاخص میزان واریانس استخراج‌شده، برابر 0/41بود. اعتبار مقیاس نیز با ضریب آلفای کرونباخ 0/92، ضریب امگا 0/91و اعتبار مرکب 0/90، مناسب ارزیابی شد. همبستگی با پرسشنامه کوتاه نشانه‌های بیماری (0/001>r= 0/76 ،P) و پرسشنامه شادکامی آکسفورد (0/001 >r=- 0/54، p)، روایی همگرا و واگرا را تأیید کرد.
نتیجه‌گیری: نسخه فارسی پرسشنامه سوگ آسیب‌زا دارای پایایی و روایی مناسبی است؛ با این حال، بازنگری در گویه ۱۵ و استفاده از نمونه متنوع‌تر برای افزایش تعمیم‌پذیری توصیه می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of traumatic grief inventory-self report

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zahra Morsali 1
  • Parviz Azadfallah 2
  • Hojjatollah Farahani 3
1 Ph.D Candidate in Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Associate Professor Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Background: This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Traumatic Grief Inventory–Self Report (TGI-SR) in a convenience sample of Iranian bereaved individuals.
Method: The present survey research; included 138 bereaved adults (127 women and 11 men; mean age = 44 years); who had experienced the death of a loved one more than one year prior and were recruited via convenience sampling. Participants completed the Persian TGI-SR along with the Brief Symptom Inventory and the Oxford Happiness Inventory. Data were analyzed using CFA, correlation coefficients and reliability indices including Cronbach’s alpha, McDonald’s omega, and composite reliability.
Results: After model modifications, CFA indicated acceptable model fit; all items except item 15 had factor loadings above 0.40. The AVE was 0.41. Internal consistency was satisfactory, with Cronbach’s alpha= 0.92, McDonald’s omega= 0.91, and CR= 0.90. Correlations with BSI-53 (r= 0.76, p< 0.001) and OHI (r= -0.54, p< 0.001) confirmed convergent and discriminant validity.
Conclusion: The Persian TGI-SR demonstrates adequate reliability and validity; however, revision of item 15 and use of a more diverse sample are recommended to enhance generalizability.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Traumatic grief
  • confirmatory factor analysis
  • validity
  • reliability
  • psychometrics

مراجع

  1.  

    1. Szuhany KL, Malgaroli M, Miron CD, Simon NM. Prolonged grief disorder: Course, diagnosis, assessment, and treatment. Focus. 2021 Jun;19(2):161-72. Doi:10.1176/appi.focus.20200052
    2. Prigerson HG, Kakarala S, Gang J, Maciejewski PK. History and status of prolonged grief disorder as a psychiatric diagnosis. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2021 May 7;17(1):109-26. Doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-093600
    3. Frumkin MR, Robinaugh DJ, LeBlanc NJ, Ahmad Z, Bui E, Nock MK, Simon NM, McNally RJ. The pain of grief: Exploring the concept of psychological pain and its relation to complicated grief, depression, and risk for suicide in bereaved adults. J Clin Psychol. 2021 Jan;77(1):254-67. Doi:10.1002/jclp.23024
    4. Shear MK, Simon N, Wall M, Zisook S, Neimeyer R, Duan N, Reynolds C, Lebowitz B, Sung S, Ghesquiere A, Gorscak B. Complicated grief and related bereavement issues for DSM‐ Depress. Anxiety. 2011 Feb;28(2):103-17. Doi:10.1002/da.20780
    5. Boelen PA, Smid GE. Disturbed grief: prolonged grief disorder and persistent complex bereavement disorder. Bmj. 2017 May 18;357. Doi:10.1136/bmj.j2016
    6. Parisi A, Sharma A, Howard MO, Wilson AB. The relationship between substance misuse and complicated grief: A systematic review. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Aug 1;103:43-57. Doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2019.05.012
    7. Shear MK. Complicated grief. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 8;372(2):153-60. Available from: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMcp1315618
    8. Prigerson HG, Horowitz MJ, Jacobs SC, Parkes CM, Aslan M, Goodkin K, Raphael B, Marwit SJ, Wortman C, Neimeyer RA, Bonanno G. Prolonged grief disorder: Psychometric validation of criteria proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11. PLoS Med. 2009 Aug 4;6(8):e1000121. Doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000121
    9. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. American psychiatric association; 2013 May 22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
    10. World Health Organization. International classification of diseases (ICD) revision, 11th revision (ICD-11). World Health Organization. 2018 May 28. Available from: International Classification of Diseases (ICD)
    11. Boelen PA, Smid GE. The traumatic grief inventory self-report version (TGI-SR): introduction and preliminary psychometric evaluation. J Loss Trauma. 2017;22(3):196-212. Doi:1080/15325024.2017.1284488
    12. Prigerson HG, Maciejewski PK, Reynolds III CF, Bierhals AJ, Newsom JT, Fasiczka A, et al. Inventory of complicated grief: a scale to measure maladaptive symptoms of loss. Psychiatry Res. 1995;59(1-2):65-79. Doi:10.1016/0165-1781(95)02757-2
    13. Prigerson HO, Jacobs SC. Traumatic grief as a distinct disorder: a rationale, consensus criteria, and a preliminary empirical test. In: Stroebe MS, Hansson RO, Stroebe W, Schut H, editors. Handbook of bereavement research: consequences, coping, and care. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 2001. p. 613-45. Doi:10.1037/10436-026
    14. Lee SA. The persistent complex bereavement inventory: a measure based on the DSM-5. Death Stud. 2015;39(7):399-410. Doi:10.1080/07481187.2015.1029144
    15. Faschingbauer TR, Devaul RA, Zisook S. Development of the Texas inventory of grief. The American journal of psychiatry. 1977 Jun. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1176/ajp.134.6.696
    16. Rosenblatt R. The age of irony comes to an end. Time. 2001;158(13):79-79. Available from: https://time.com/archive/6664896/the-age-of-irony-comes-to-an-end/​
    17. Shakerian A, Mardi N. Predicting the reaction to bereavement based on the practice of religious beliefs and seeking meaning in the individuals bereaved due to COVID-19. J Res Relig Health. 2024;10(1):110-21. [Persian]. Doi:10.22037/jrrh.v10i1.39299
    18. Azim Oghlui Oskooi PB, Farahbakhsh K, Moradi O. Effective fields the experience of mourning after the death of a family member: a phenomenological study. J Couns Cult Psychother. 2021;12(45):101-40. [Persian]. Doi:10.22054/qccpc.2020.48664.2275
    19. Mousavi R, Payamani B. The course of collective memory in the formation of mourning culture in Iran's religious society based on the theory of "collective memory" by Maurice Halbwachs with the case study of Ashura and Siyavoshan ceremonies. Sociol Cult Stud, Inst Humanit Cult Stud (IHCS). 2024;15(1):251-79. [Persian]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.30465/scs.2024.9341
    20. Bentler PM, Chou CP. Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociol Methods Res. 1987;16(1):78-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124187016001004
    21. Derogatis LR. Brief symptom inventory. Eur J Psychol Assess. 1993. Doi:10.1037/t00789-000
    22. Akhavan Abiri F, Shairi MR. Validity and reliability of Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R) and Brief Symptom Inventory-53 (BSI-53). Clin Psychol Pers. 2020;2(33):169-95. [Persian]. Available from: https://share.sid.ir/paper/208738/fa?media=1
    23. Hilberdink CE, Ghainder K, Dubanchet A, Hinton D, Djelantik AM, Hall BJ, et al. Bereavement issues and prolonged grief disorder: A global perspective. Cambridge Prisms Glob Ment Health. 2023;10:e32. https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2023.28
    24. Moor N, de Graaf PM. Temporary and long-term consequences of bereavement on happiness. J Happiness Stud. 2016 Jun;17(3):913-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9624-x
    25. Hills P, Argyle M. The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: a compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being.Pers Individ Dif. 2002 Nov 1;33(7):1073-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00213-6
    26. Hills P, Argyle M. The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: a compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being. Pers Individ Dif. 2002;33(7):1073-82. Doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00213-6
    27. Liaghatdar MJ, Jafari E, Abedi MR, Samiee F. Reliability and validity of the Oxford Happiness Inventory among university students in Iran. Span J Psychol. 2008 May;11(1):310-3. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/645611/en
    28. George D, Mallery P. IBM SPSS statistics 29 step by step: a simple guide and reference. Routledge; 2024. Doi:10.4324/9781032622156
    29. Anderson TW, Darling DA. A Test of Goodness of Fit. J Am Stat Assoc. 1954 Dec;49(268):765-9. Doi:10.2307/2281537
    30. Ghasemi A, Zahediasl S. Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;10(2):486. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3505
    31. DiStefano C, Morgan GB. A comparison of diagonal weighted least squares robust estimation techniques for ordinal data. Struct Eq Model. 2014 Jul 3;21(3):425-38. Doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.915373
    32. Steenbergen MR, Marks G. Evaluating expert judgments. Eur J Polit Res. 2007 May;46(3):347-66. Doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00694.x
    33. Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with Mplus: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge; 2013. Doi:10.4324/9780203807644
    34. Shi D, Lee T, Maydeu-Olivares A. Understanding the model size effect on SEM fit indices. Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Apr;79(2):310-34. Doi:10.1177/0013164418783530
    35. Quayle K, Jones P, Di Simplicio M, Kamboj S, Pitman A. Exploring the phenomenon of intrusive mental imagery after suicide bereavement: A qualitative interview study in a British sample. PLoS One. 2023;18(8):e0284897. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284897
    36. Eisma MC. Prolonged grief disorder in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR: Challenges and controversies. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2023 Jul;57(7):944-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674231154206
    37. Eisma MC, Janshen A, Lenferink LI. Content overlap analyses of ICD-11 and DSM-5 prolonged grief disorder and prior criteria-sets. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022;13(1):2011691. Doi:10.1080/20008198.2021.2011691
    38. Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Publications; 2015. Available from: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-10560-000
    39. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res. 1981 Feb;18(1):39-50. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.2307/3151312
    40. Cheung GW, Cooper-Thomas HD, Lau RS, Wang LC. Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pac J Manag. 2024 Jun 1;41(2):745-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y
    41. Markon KE, Chmielewski M, Miller CJ. The reliability and validity of discrete and continuous measures of psychopathology: a quantitative review. Psychol Bull. 2011;137(5):856. Doi:10.1037/a0023678
    42. Bonanno GA, Malgaroli M. Trajectories of grief: comparing symptoms from the DSM‐5 and ICD‐11 diagnoses. Depress Anxiety. 2020 Jan;37(1):17-25. Doi:10.1002/da.22902
    43. Chentsova‐Dutton YE, Ryder AG. Cultural models of normalcy and deviancy. Asian J Soc Psychol. 2020 Jun;23(2):187-204. Doi:10.1111/ajsp.12413
    44. De Vaus J, Hornsey MJ, Kuppens P, Bastian B. Exploring the East-West divide in prevalence of affective disorder: a case for cultural differences in coping with negative emotion. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2018;22(3):285-304. Doi:1177/1088868317736222
    45. Karimitar A. Mourning rituals and their psychological meanings in Iranian culture [dissertation]. Pullman (WA): Washington State University; 2019. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/2376/100515
    46. Akbarzadeh M, Abdollahi Bagherabadi G, Ghodrati Mirkouhi M. Impact of Islamic-Iranian lifestyle–based mindful self-compassion training on psychological distress and emotional efficiency in bereaved survivors of COVID-19.Clin 1404;17(2):99–115. [Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22075/jcp.2025.36445.309
    47. Bagheri M. Conceptualizations of sadness in Persian. InPersian linguistics in cultural contexts. 2020 Oct 29 (pp. 127-140). Routledge. Doi:10.4324/9780429470165
    48. Pourkhaleghi-Chatroudi M, Haqparast L. A comparative study of mourning rituals in Shahnameh and the remnants of religious mourning practices in ancient Iran. Nasr Res Persian Lit. [Persian]. Available from: http://noo.rs/3sAXd
    49. Abe S. Culture of Mourning in Iran During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Funeral Rituals, Emotions, and Stigma. InSOCIAL STIGMA AND THE PANDEMIC: Key Challenges and Responses Across Greater Asia 2025 (pp. 13-32). Doi:10.1142/9789811284618_0002
    50. Bolaséll LT, Pinzón JH, Boelen PA, et al. The Traumatic Grief Inventory Self-Report (TGI-SR) as a clinical measure to identify Brazilians with prolonged grief disorder and persistent complex bereavement disorder. Trends Psychol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-023-00316-5
    51. Cherblanc J, Gagnon C, Côté I, Bergeron-Leclerc C, Cadell S, Gauthier G, et al. French-Canadian validation of the traumatic grief inventory-self report (TGI-SR). Death Stud. 2023 Apr 21;47(4):430-9. Doi:10.1080/07481187.2022.2085347
    52. Baş S, Yüksel Ö, Ülbe S, Güngör D. Turkish version of the traumatic grief inventory-self report (TGI-SR): Validity and reliability. Death Stud. 2022 Jul;46(6):1481–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2020.1850551
    53. Boelen PA, Huntjens RJ. Intrusive images in grief: an exploratory study. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2008;15(4):217-26. Doi:10.1002/cpp.568
    54. DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1991. Available from: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1991-98125-000
    55. Boelen PA, Lenferink LI. Symptoms of prolonged grief, posttraumatic stress, and depression in recently bereaved people: symptom profiles, predictive value, and cognitive behavioural correlates. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020; 55:765-77. Doi:10.1007/s00127-019-01776-w
    56. Milman E. Non-death loss and grief: context and clinical implications [book review]. Omega (Westport). 2021;84(1):340-3. Doi:10.1177/00302228211020156
    57. Smith KV, Ehlers A. Cognitive predictors of grief trajectories in the first months of loss: a latent growth mixture model. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020;88(2):93. Doi:10.1037/ccp0000438
    58. Shi P, Yang A, Zhao Q, Chen Z, Ren X, Dai Q. A hypothesis of gender differences in self-reporting symptom of depression: implications to solve under-diagnosis and under-treatment of depression in males. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 25;12:589687. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.589687
    59. Stroebe M, Stroebe W, Schut H. Gender differences in adjustment to bereavement: An empirical and theoretical review. Rev Gen Psychol. 2001 Mar;5(1):62-83. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.1.62
    60. Lundorff M, Bonanno GA, Johannsen M, O'Connor M. Are there gender differences in prolonged grief trajectories? A registry-sampled cohort study. J Psychiatr Res. 2020 Oct 1;129:168–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.06.030
    61. Lenferink LI, Eisma MC, Smid GE, de Keijser J, Boelen PA. Valid measurement of DSM-5 persistent complex bereavement disorder and DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 prolonged grief disorder: the Traumatic Grief Inventory–Self Report Plus (TGI-SR+). Compr Psychiatry. 2022; 112:152281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152281

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 11 تیر 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 25 آذر 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 08 دی 1404
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 05 اسفند 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار: 01 تیر 1405

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار